You are browsing the archive for 2011 September 02.

Does the Tea Party Understand Assets?

September 2, 2011 in Finance

Piggy BankThe United States financial system is built upon debt. Because the United States has the world’s largest economy, this means the world’s economy is also built upon debt. This bothers so many Americans that representatives from a new party (The Tea Party) have almost acquired enough power in Congress to disrupt this system.

United States’ citizens, who have made a habit of complaining about unemployment, debt, money, war, religion, and healthcare, believe the only way to solve all of the problems they complain about is to destroy the debt system. Their actions, built upon their complaining attitudes, have brought the world’s economy to a breakpoint.

Lest my comments sound naïve, please allow me to explain. The crux of the argument between the Tea Party and the current point of view is that the United States financial system is not built upon a real asset. The Tea Party wants to return to a system built upon valuable metals such as gold or silver. The current system is built upon debt instruments.

The paper we use in the United States for trade is a debt note. That is why it says “Federal Reserve Note” across the top. We are writing a series of articles in the United States section of this website about this topic so we won’t repeat that information here. The short explanation is that whenever America needs more currency, the Federal Reserve Bank issues it. This currency comes into circulation as a debt instrument when someone borrows it. Those debts provide the asset base for the paper.

The Tea Party philosophy thinks this is not a real asset. They think this in spite of the fact that the United States has intermittently used this system since before the American Revolution.

I have considered this issue for quite a while. I have done taxes since the late 1970s and have run an accounting practice since 1993. I stayed away from debt for many years. Then, thanks to Robert Kiyosaki’s writings, I learned about good debt versus bad debt and I piled up the good debt in an effort to create wealth. Even though it took me a while to get through the learning curve, I see the value of debt.

However, just because it is a valuable tool, does that make it an asset?

That’s the question being debated in the United States and around the world. Today, the world’s economy says it is. My accounting brain has a difficult time calling debt, which is plainly a liability, an asset. Yet, that is what we do every time we use an American dollar to make a purchase.

After several weeks of wrangling with this issue, I think I’ve come up with an answer. I’ll write about that is a future article.

Who Are You and What Did You Do With Our Country?

September 2, 2011 in United States

United StatesI ask several questions on the United State page of this website. I ask these questions because I’ve been confused for several years about the United States. My confusion comes from what I was taught in school versus what I see happening around me.

As I read internet articles, chat with intelligent people, watch TV news, and listen to talk radio, I’ve discovered I’m not the only person confused about this. It seems that the United States of America is a much different place than what we were taught in school. In fact, when we start looking closely, we are tempted to ask “Who are you and what did you do with our country?”

The first three questions on the United States page are:

  • If the United States was founded as a republic, why do we now call ourselves a democracy?
  • Why does the Federal Reserve, an independent bank, control the monetary policies of the United States?
  • How do these things impact the United States Constitution?

I assumed that the change from a republic to a democracy was just a matter of terminology. The meanings of words change over time. I never considered that maybe the form of government had changed. After all, when Americans pledge allegiance to the flag, we still pledge allegiance “to the Republic for which it stands.” When we vote in a presidential election, it is still a representative vote. The total votes don’t determine who wins. The Electoral College, a republic election system, determines the winner.

The United States didn’t change did it?

I love to read history. A few summers ago, I read the biographies of Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. The debate between the two men’s philosophies still rages. Jefferson warned of the danger of a national bank. Hamilton believed the bank was necessary. History tells us that both men were accurate. A national bank has become necessary and it may be the greatest danger our country faces.

Did the influence of this national bank cause the change in the United States?

I have watched in amazement over the past several years as constitutional rights have been eroded in the United States. I didn’t understand how this was happening until I read Paul Craig Roberts’ book The Tyranny of Good Intentions: How Prosecutors and Law Enforcement Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice. There, I discovered the court systems have been manipulated by those who work within them to accomplish personal agendas while destroying the rights of United States’ citizens.

Is it possible that this manipulation is related to the national bank and the change in the United States?

I stumbled across possible answers to these questions a few months ago. I’ll write about those in a future article.

What is News?

September 2, 2011 in Opinion

HeadlinesOur goal with Peace of Mind News is to have relevant responses to late-breaking news. The biggest challenge for us is “Which news stories deserve the responses?”

Over the previous twenty-four hours, the following stories earned our attention:

  • Five Major United States Earthquakes Predicted Over the Next Ten Days
  • 57 Governments Represented at Secret Financial Meeting
  • Recent Virginia Earthquake was Manmade
  • New Land Appears in Russia
  • Libya Surrender Deadline Extended
  • United States to Sue Banks

We researched these stories and realized few are really news. Some are speculation about things that could happen. Others are guesses about things that may have happened.

The only story about something that really happened is the new land that appeared in Russia. I think it is news whenever 24 million tons of clay pushes to the surface and forms an island in the middle of a sea. We will write about it in the Future section of this website in a few days.

The other stories are just speculation. They tease us with hope of something bigger and grander that may happen around the corner. They entertain.

Until they happen, we’ll respond to events that have actually happened and help you with a peaceful response to those items.