You are browsing the archive for 2011 October 07.

The Price of a Poor Financial Education

October 7, 2011 in Finance

My personal philosophy on financial matters is that each person is responsible for his or her financial well-being. This is one of the reasons I support the Occupy Together Movement. I believe many of the participants understand this. In addition, they understand the global financial situation and have the courage to take steps to resolve it.

They have realized that the education system did not prepare them for life by providing a financial education. This practice initially left them confused about how to make a living. They were taught that society owes it to them. Now, they realize it is up to them and they are trying to learn what they were not taught in school.

Occupy Together Bloomberg CainPoliticians, like Mayor Bloomberg of New York City and leading Republican Presidential Candidate, Herman Cain, are so out of touch they don’t realize this is happening with the majority of the people in the United States. Apparently, they don’t know that nearly half of the American households receive some form of government benefits.

In other words, we have a world of people who don’t know how to make a living led by those who don’t understand why it is this way.

This doesn’t surprise me. I’ve spent much of my life studying and working within the financial and tax industries and most of my clients don’t understand the system either. This isn’t because these people have a below average intelligence. It is because the information they have heard comes from those who need others to be uninformed so they can sell their products. Therefore, the “education” is full of misinformation.

For example, financial and investment advisors, including “Certified Financial Planners,” are trained to sell products that benefit the wealthy at the expense of the middle class. The CFP title makes it appear these individuals are more educated about wealth creation. The truth is CFPs are trained how to perform advanced formulaic tasks. A review of most CFPs’ portfolios will reveal they are NOT experts on investing or wealth creation.

Consumers have misplaced confidence in these financial industry “experts.” They think they are receiving accurate advice, so they follow it. Then, when their investments go sour, they are ashamed to talk about it because they feel they must have misunderstood what they were supposed to do.

The Occupy Together Movement is bringing light to these types of issues. Those who control the money and the power are doing everything they can to discredit this movement because, if things change, it will change the way they have to do business. An educated population asks questions and that makes leaders uncomfortable because the truth will reduce their money and power.

I recently received confirmation of this through a personal situation and I’ll write about that in an upcoming article.

How comfortable are you with your financial education? Do you understand the financial system? Leave your comments below.

The Real Purpose of the War on Drugs

October 7, 2011 in United States

I recently wrote about the possibility that law enforcements agencies are complicit in allowing drugs into the United States. In addition, I speculated that these agencies are in alliances with drug cartels and banks in this distribution system. These ideas are not original with me.

This article contains links to media reports that support my previous comments. Before you dismiss these reports as coming from fringe sources, I suggest you look at them. These sources are all from mainstream networks and publications. It is not a stretch to say something suspect is happening in the War on Drugs as conducted by United States officials.

In this video, a Greensboro, North Carolina news department reports on the frustration of southern Arizona ranchers over the border situation. Notice the well-built tunnels that allow transportation of drugs through the border. If a TV news station can find it, certainly those responsible for the border enforcement can find it. Why does it remain open? Is it possible it needs to remain open to meet the agendas of those who control the drug traffic?

In this story about “Fast and Furious,” it is clear that high-ranking government officials ordered the sale of guns to the most powerful Mexican drug cartel. This has been disguised as a sting operation gone wrong. However, as more information comes to the surface, it is obvious something else was going on here. How many weapons have been sold to this cartel and other cartels by United States Government officials that have not been discovered through the “Fast and Furious” investigation?

This story documents how drug money is smuggled into the United States for deposit into large banks. In addition, it reports on the murders and destruction of property that result from the illegal drug trade. How much would we reduce crime by ending government involvement with drug trafficking?

War on DrugsWhat is the solution? The common response is “increase enforcement.” This is what is said in this United States Government report, issued in June 2011. However, the evidence is that enforcement is what perpetuates the violence, raises the drug prices, and increases profit. If the demand for the drug supersedes the will of the people for drug laws, why keep the laws? The answer is obvious. The laws are kept in place to create a violent atmosphere, drive up prices, and increase profit.

As you can see by the links in this article, this is not a secret. The War on Drugs has been fought for more than forty years without an outcome. History tells us that war is always lucrative business. This is another example of those in power making money from both sides of the war: first through the sale of drugs and then via taxpayer-funded salaries paid for the arrest and imprisoning of the distributers and users.

What is the peaceful response to this situation? The Global Commission on Drug Policy suggests a systematic plan to legalize drugs. This would reduce the price of illegal drugs by opening supply lines and reducing the amount of confiscated product. Lower prices would reduce the incentive for drug cartels and discourage violence.

I suggest an additional step. Remove law enforcement from the drug business by releasing everyone arrested or convicted on drug-related charges. This would solve many other problems including prison overcrowding. If these releases were combined with using law enforcement funds for drug counseling, we would certainly make more progress with this issue than we are making today.

What is your opinion? Is it time for a different approach to illegal drugs?

Please leave your comments below.