You are browsing the archive for World.

We’ve Only Just Begun

June 14, 2013 in United States, World

For those who are paying attention, the story of Edward Snowden has captured our imagination.

PRISMIt is the stuff of a movie plot.

Snowden gave up a large salary, a beautiful girlfriend, and a successful career to expose government invasion of privacy through a system known as PRISM.

According to his most recent interview with the South China Morning Post, he intends to hide out in Hong Kong and allow the courts there to decide his fate.

Snowden has made startling statements about government spying.

In response, government officials have denied Snowden’s allegations. They say they doubt he had access to everything he claims.

Their denials remind me of the arguments I hear from clients who lack computer savvy. They stare in stupefied amazement when I explain how Google Cloud Print allows me to print to the wireless printer in my office from wherever I am located with my smart phone.

The officials who say Snowden was not allowed access to those areas forget that he had a top-secret clearance AND he was a computer geek. He pay rate indicates he had unusual technical skills and, with those skills, it is likely he could access anything he wanted to access.

Glenn Beck claims Snowden’s information is just the beginning. Supposedly, Beck has access to whistleblower info that will make Snowden’s claims pale in comparison. He says the new material is so earthshaking that the person will only reveal it in front of Congress on live television.

Beck ends the video clip linked here by saying, “You haven’t even begun to be outraged.”

This assumes that people are outraged at a government that stores every piece of communication it can store.

At the 10:45 mark of the video linked in this article, Snowden’s says, “My greatest fear regarding the outcome of these disclosures is that nothing will change.”

He understands that Americans tend not to be outraged about a situation until it affects them directly.

In fact, this is the issue that alternative media generally faces when attempting to share a story that has a fringe element to it or sounds conspiratorial.

The general public won’t accept the story unless they hear it on mainstream media.

Therefore, they follow the lead of those who would suffer consequences if the stories were true.

They ridicule and deny the facts, even when thorough investigation indicates they are true.

At this point, it appears the Snowden story may help the general public become more accepting of stories reported in non-mainstream sources.

After all, alternative media has been reporting on the collection of personal data for more than a decade.

Two other topics where we may soon see a shift include UFO reports and the spraying of chemtrails.

Ed Komarek, from UFO digest, says the Snowden story could spur a similar break on the UFO story.

Swiss scientists are seeking funding to investigate and document the chemtrail phenomenon in a proposed movie entitled Overcast.

The signs indicate we are on the threshold of numerous revelations.

It remains to be seen what the general public will do with this new information.

Taking it Mainstream

June 13, 2013 in United States, World

Edward SnowdenTaken at face value, The Guardian’s story about government spying, which has since been tied to defense contractor employee Edward Snowden, is both a warning and a confirmation

If you are an uninformed American, it is warning, from mainstream media, that the U.S. government is tracking everything you do. Every financial transaction, every phone call, every text message, and every email is being stored.

The purpose of this storage is to be able to use your history to disable you should you cross whomever is in power.

If you are an informed American, this story is a confirmation of what alternative media have told us for years: the U.S. government is watching everyone all the time.

I have heard this information so much that when The Guardian broke its story about PRISM, (Planning Tool for Resource Integration, Synchronization, and Management) a software program used by American’s National Security Agency (NSA), I initially thought this was old news.

I remembered reading about something similar in Michael Ruppert’s Crossing the Rubicon, published in 2004.

I found an online version of the book and, after a brief glance at the Table of Contents, I found what I was looking for in Chapter 10: PROMIS: Controlling the Data.

PROMIS is an acronym for Prosecutor’s Management Information System.

It is a software system that provides backdoor entry into database systems.

Ruppert’s almost thirty-page chapter documents the program’s history and speculates on possible uses of PROMIS, including the role it likely played in 9/11.

I’ve previously written about these types of systems, including the Utah database storage system.

With the unveiling of PRISM, possibly an upgraded version or PROMIS, these fringe stories and conspiratorial ideas have all become mainstream.

When we consider this story, the recent White House scandal about the seizing of reporters’ phone records, and the news that the IRS is targeting certain groups for special scrutiny, we can see the ramifications of what is possible in the United States.

Government has the capability to watch almost everything you do.

Now that this knowledge is mainstream, what’s next?

The Director of National Intelligence released the document linked here to tell us all of this surveillance is legal and necessary.

There has been outcry from those who still believe that privacy is a constitutional right.

Justice department officials are considering pressing charges against Snowden.

And, some intelligence officials were overheard saying he should be “disappeared,” a term used to describe government sponsored murder and kidnapping.

For now, Snowden, who initially hid out in a Hong Kong hotel room, has gone into hiding

Obviously, he knows the difficulty of seclusion in today’s technological world.

While all of these are important considerations, the one that looms largest to me is the fact that a fringe story has gone mainstream.

I’ll explore those ramifications in tomorrow’s writing.

Policy Shift

June 10, 2013 in World

I previously wrote about how to use the intersection of information between mainstream media (MSM), alternative media, and other conflicting viewpoints to determine what is really taking place with a news topic. 

The short explanation is that, within the alternative versions of a story, there are pieces of information reported by all sources. Generally, these parts of the story are true.

The intersection of information in the coverage of the Turkish protests is huge.

In fact, it is larger than any other major new story I have followed in the past few years.

All sources agree on all parts of the story.

Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan is the bad guy. He is tearing down parks and replacing them with shopping malls. He is attempting to implement laws against personal freedom.

Rather than listen to the concerns of his fellow-citizens, he pushes ahead with his own agendas.

Therefore, spontaneous protests have broken out in his country.

The intersection of information is so large that I find myself questioning it.

Are the citizens really protesting? Yes, that appears to be happening.

Are MSM outlets reporting accurate numbers of protesters? Yes, this is generally true.

As I wrote yesterday, this is likely a bottom-up top-down strategy to crush Erdogan.

glowing shift keyHowever, the bigger story is that this seems to evidence of a genuine shift in how MSM is reporting information.

I considered other stories to see if I could find further evidence that MSM, rather than kowtow to the powers that be, is now reporting the truth.

I started with the two deadly tornadoes that went through the Oklahoma City area: one on May 20 and the other on May 31.

Initial reports of the first tornado said it was exceptionally large. Subsequent reports said it was smaller.

At the time, I speculated that the follow-up stories downplayed its size in an effort to quiet claims that the storm may have been manipulated through manmade technology.

No size estimates were given for the latter storm. However, within a week, the National Weather Service said it was the widest tornado ever measured on Earth.

Obviously, this could be a natural abnormality.

However, if weather modification were being used to strengthen storms, we would expect to see storms of increasing magnitude as atmospheric energy from a developing system of multiple storms is guided into one massive storm.

In addition, we would expect the storms to become larger and larger as those using the technology become more skilled in its use.

This is exactly what we are seeing.

Of course, no one has yet proven that anyone is actually modifying the weather.

There is evidence that humanity has the technology.

So far, beyond speculation and videos that almost but don’t quite connect the dots, no one has linked this technology directly to the increasingly massive storms.

In fact, MSM has worked diligently to distract us from weather abnormalities that could only occur with manmade modification.

Is this latest admission that the tornado was the largest in recorded history an indication that MSM is preparing to tell us the story of weather modification?

I believe that is a possibility.

Are there other indicators that MSM is moving out from under the control of the powers that be and towards telling us the truth on other stories?

There are.

I’ll write about those in future articles.

Bottom-Up Top-Down in Turkey

June 9, 2013 in United States, World

One of the secondary reasons I began this website was to write about the Occupy Wall Street protests that started in September of 2011.

I am an American who was taught that the United States was founded on the romantic and noble notion that a revolution by the general population can create a long-term solution to oppression and the erosion of freedoms.

In 2011, I became acutely aware that oppression was on the rise and freedoms were on the wane.

And, I sensed that the Occupy movement had all of the ingredients to evoke the change needed to remove current oppressions and reinstate freedoms.

This idea was confirmed when I met Janet Wilson and Tino Fuentes from Occupy the Roads.

Janet had left her work as a financial advisor and driven her RV throughout the United States to provide coverage of the protests.

Tino was one of the people who participated in the initial protests on Wall Street. He left his job as a social worker in the New York area to accompany Janet.

He eventually arrived in Pueblo, Colorado and established an Occupy beachhead in that area.

This wasn’t an office for protesters.

Instead, he and his team found an abandoned property, acquired it, fixed it up, and began to provide practical solutions for the area.

Since I wrote about his work last November, Tino has moved back to New York and other people now “Occupy” the work.

They have acquired a second house and expanded their peaceful response in southern Colorado.

As I began to write about that movement, I was surprised when several freedom-loving friends said the Occupy movement wasn’t what I thought it was.

They said Occupy’s purpose was to create more oppression and erode more freedoms through a “bottom-up top-down” strategy.

According to my friends, those in the business of oppression often assist protesters. They encourage them to riot and to become violent. This is “bottom-up.”

This violence provides an excuse for law enforcement to respond with excessive force and for lawmakers to write legislation that further limits freedoms. This is “top-down.”

This strategy crushes those in the middle.

My friends said that those who wish to do the crushing are actually the ones funding the Occupy movement.

I searched and could only find oblique references to this funding so I’m not convinced of my friends’ arguments.

However, I can’t deny that, even though Occupy has made significant strides in their vision of bringing equity to the oppressed, the actions against their protests have led to increased restrictions in freedom of assembly and freedom of speech.

Turkey Map

This perspective is the filter I use while observing the recent protests, assemblies, and riots in Turkey.

Therefore, when mainstream media, alternative media, bloggers, and all other reports tell the same story, I am puzzled.

When I hear that tens of thousands or, according to some reports, hundreds of thousands, even millions, of Turkish citizens are spontaneously assembling in the streets for the purposes of freedom, I am hopeful and I am skeptical.

This could be a wonderful story of a spontaneous response to oppression.

It could be a revolution of the people.

And, it could be orchestrated to crush those in the middle.

In this case, the ones in the middle could be Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan and his staff.

Exterior forces may be churning public support against the Turkish Prime Minister because of his decisions regarding Syria.

I am sure there are those in Turkey who would love to see Erdogan removed from office, just as there are those in the United States who would like to see Obama impeached.

However, the current riots and protests seem too well organized and the stories have too little conflicting information.

I sense something else is taking place.

My guess is that Erdogan has crossed someone powerful and that power is orchestrating events to remove him.

In Turkey, it isn’t the people that reside in the middle of this bottom-up top-down strategy.

Instead, the Prime Minister resides there.

No Conflicting Information

June 8, 2013 in World

The situation in Turkey puzzles me.

The storyline is too neat. Mainstream media agrees with alternative media.

Every article provides the same details.

Turkey protest

  • Developers were going to tear down Gezi Park in Istanbul’s Taksim Square and build a shopping mall.
  • Protesters arrived to oppose the work.
  • Police showed up with tear gas and water cannons, injuring protesters.
  • Tens of thousands of people throughout the country took to the streets in response.

All reports portray this as a spontaneous demonstration of frustration over increasingly conservative and authoritarian decisions by current Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan.

One of my Facebook friends is an American military member who recently returned stateside after serving in Turkey. She has posted numerous items from her friends in Turkey, including this translated report.

The despotic Turkish PM, on a dubious visit to Algeria after being refused an audience with the Moroccan King during his visit in that country, SMASHED and BROKE his tablet in a fit while watching his stand-in deputy Mr. Arinc make apology to the people who’ve faced police violence. Apparently, the apology was not in the original text of the announcement.

It is quite well known how Erdogan goes ballistic on his staff for sub-par performance while he’s out of the country. However, those days are over for Mr. Erdogan. So much has changed, and so quickly, since he’s gone, that it actually might be better for him and his family not to return.

Slightly related news:

Erdogan’s aide, Mr. Huseyin Celik made an announcement to “all who have given their hearts to AK Party”, urging them NOT TO COME to the airport for the PM’s scheduled arrival tomorrow at Istanbul Ataturk Airport. He added that his request was in response to a supposed rumor that a huge crowd was to assemble at the airport to welcome the despotic PM, noting that Erdogan is not a leader in need of such shows of affection. Very cheeky stuff indeed. Looks like Mr. Celik didn’t get it yet either. 

Meanwhile, Hurriyet newspaper’s Ankara chief Metehan Demir takes his place of shame alongside Fatih Altayli of Haberturk TV, as he stated on CNN Turk today, “the most important group to consider right now is NOT the protesters in the streets, but the press reporters accompanying Erdogan on his four day visit. I’d like to request that no reporters ask Erdogan any questions for the next few days. If necessary, talk about unrelated topics, and don’t mention anything about the protests. Let’s restrict ourselves and wait for two days, so this tension is dispersed”. Metehan should start looking around, for career change is imminently upon him, because he too JUST DID NOT GET IT. 

If this information is accurate, it appears the Turkish Prime Minister has lost the confidence of the citizens. Furthermore, he and his staff don’t believe they need the support of the people as long as they have the support of the press.

At this point, it appears he has neither.

Mainstream media decry his policies

Press TV, which typically provides reports that contrast American media, says Erdogan’s international policies, especially his policies regarding the support of NATO’s attempt to overthrow President Assad in Syria, are the primary factor in the protests.

The consistent and unbending message from all media is that Turkish citizens have had enough of Erdogan.

Is this actually a spontaneous uprising in response to a dictator?

Will we see democracy rise to the surface in Turkey along with Erdogan’s removal from office?

Or, is something else going on there?

Whirling Protests

June 7, 2013 in World

One of the qualities we find within the controversy surrounding Rossi’s E-Cat is the relative absence of mainstream media (MSM) coverage of the new technology.

In fact, the more I observe world news, the more I am certain MSM’s coverage is scripted, produced, and directed the same as any movie or pre-recorded show.

I have heard other people say this. I have written about it myself.

However, I have only recently become convinced of it.

dervish turkey gas maskThe final argument came to me while I listened to sports talk shows, both on TV and on radio. Each show is unique because of the various personalities and each show is the same because of the day’s talking points.

Depending on the day, I listen to Fox Sports, ESPN, CBS Sports, and NBC Sports. On the days when I listen to more than one program, the first show I hear always tells me what to expect on the subsequent programs.

Of course, this isn’t limited to sports.

Conan O’Brien has put together montages of news shows using the exact same script to report a story on TV stations across the country.

It is obvious that the sports shows I listen to and the new shows in O’Brien’s examples rely upon one source for their information.

Those who control this source of information get to pick what does and does not get into the script.

Rossi’s LENR work doesn’t get into the script.

Deadly tornadoes get into the script. Weekend shootings in New York City and Chicago do not.

Wildfires in the United States get into the script.

Revolution in Turkey does not.

WAIT!

Is there a revolution happening in Turkey?

After following this story for several days, I believe there is.

The pictures in the story linked here show tens of thousands of people in the streets opposing Turkish authorities.

This video explains one protester’s viewpoint of events.

This blog post provides a written explanation.

This story provides MSM’s version of the story from a London source.

Domestic MSM outlets took several days to echo the story in the U.S.

The official and unofficial story is that the protests started in Istanbul when a group gathered to oppose converting a park into a shopping mall.

Police responded with force, including tear gas and water cannons, and the Turkish citizenry took to the streets en masse to protest the brutal acts.

There are claims that as many as forty thousand people marched in protest over the Bosphorus Bridge that connects Europe and Asia.

Obviously, a reaction this large is about more than a few trees in a park.

Supposedly, that situation was a catalyst for people to express their displeasure with their current government that threatens to tighten laws on alcohol, cesarean birth, abortion, and lipstick color.

I’ve tried to learn more.

However, coverage is sketchy.

Much of the information isn’t in English so it is difficult to grasp the full story.

Pictures have emerged of Sufis protesting by doing whirling dervishes while wearing gas masks, including the one featured in this article.

My gut tells me this story fits into world events on a broader level.

My head doesn’t yet know the connections.

I’ll attempt to find them in tomorrow’s writing.

A God Without Power

June 4, 2013 in Spirituality, World

Two summers ago, for my fiftieth birthday, a Jewish friend gave me a copy of Moral Grandeur and Spiritual Audacity,a collection of essays written by the late Abraham Joshua Heschel, a rabbi and a holocaust survivor.

Partly out of obligation to my friend and partly out of curiosity, I waded through the compositions.

I hoped to find fresh ideas from a Jewish perspective that would speak to a peaceful new world.

Instead, I found a man who decried the problems in our world and offered solutions that would only continue them.

Initially, I was struck by how Heschel’s underlying attitudes against the Nazis were identical to the attitudes of the Nazis.

GodThe Jews believe God choose them for a unique purpose. The Nazis believed destiny had chosen them.

The religious exclusivity he claimed for the Jewish people reminded me of what I experienced while in the Christian faith. This “us-them mentality” is the root of the conflicts we face today.

Then, much to my surprise, I learned that the God that picked the Jews for their special purpose is, according to Heschel, not that powerful.

In fact, on pages 159-160 of the book, he explains that God is not omnipotent.

The whole conception of God’s omnipotence, I suspect, was taken over from Islam. God is almighty, and powerful. Man has nothing to say and nothing to do except to keep quiet and to accept. But, actually, God needs man’s cooperation. There will be no redemption without the cooperation of man. Omnipotence as such will not work. God cannot function in the world without the help of man.

Heschel concludes his four-paragraph explanation with this sentence:

I tell you that the idea of divine omnipotence, meaning, holding God responsible for everything, expecting Him to do the impossible, to defy human freedom, is a non-Jewish idea.

Obviously, I am not a Jewish scholar so it is possible that I am missing some of the nuances of Heschel’s ideas.

However, if I take his idea at face value, I encounter a paradox of extreme proportions.

The Jews are special because God picked them.

The God that picked the Jews isn’t that special.

Heschel tells us that God, the creator of the world, is not all-powerful. Therefore, God needs man as much as man needs God, possibly more.

This isn’t about God laying aside part of His power to allow humanity to experience variety, play chosen roles, and work through karma.

This is about God not having the power to affect humanity.

There is a vast difference.

Furthermore, if humanity is created in the image of this not-so-powerful God, how can we have the power to help?

The logic implodes on itself.

It is not sustainable.

One cannot empower humanity by disempowering God.

I understand that Heschel, as a holocaust survivor, may have needed this belief system to help him cope with his experience.

I understand that, because God did not intervene to prevent the holocaust, Heschel felt he must perpetuate a belief system that explains God’s inaction.

I even understand how Heschel concluded that God didn’t act because it was humanity’s responsibility to do so.

However, the contradictions within this way of thinking do not bring peace.

Peace requires a different perspective of God.

I’ll attempt to explain that perspective in tomorrow’s writing.

Evolving Universal Laws

June 2, 2013 in Spirituality, World

Can universal laws evolve?

metamorphosisRupert Sheldrake says they can. He says it is reasonable to assume that, in an evolving world, the governing laws will evolve too.

Let’s look closer at this idea and bring some clarity to it.

My experience with universal laws started with Christianity.

While practicing that religion, I was taught that certain principles were universal.

They were non-optional and never changing.

I accepted this until I discovered that those who were the most dedicated to the religion couldn’t live by the principles. The non-optional principles didn’t work for them so they choose another path.

Upon investigation, I discovered why they did this.

The universal laws of that religion contradicted themselves. They had exceptions.

Over the next eight to ten years, I attempted to resolve my cognitive dissonance by finding the universal laws that do not contradict themselves. I looked for the ones that didn’t have exceptions.

I documented this research in Complete Peace of Mind Training where I discuss my experiences with the Law of Miracles, Law of Attraction, and Law of Abundance; three laws that, as far as I can tell, operate without exception.

By my definition, these are universal laws. They provide the basis for an unlimited belief system that operates with complete integrity.

Because these laws are universal, they are complete.

They may not evolve.

Therefore, when I first encountered Sheldrake’s work, I struggled with his idea that universal laws may evolve.

However, rather than dismiss his idea completely, I decided to look closer.

I discovered that Sheldrake was challenging scientists who define a universal law and then, do not consider evidence that may contradict it.

Rather than consider that the law may have changed or that their previous understanding may have been incomplete, these scientists dig in their heels to support an idea that is increasingly difficult to defend.

Their practice is similar to the practice of the religious experts I encountered. They know that a change in the underlying “universal law” would upset the large body of work based upon said law. Therefore, they participate in covering up and debunking the new information.

In Sheldrake’s banned TED talk, he tells the story of how the values of universal constants, such as the speed of light and the gravitational universal constant, have varied over the years. When he discussed this with British metrology officials, they told him this was an embarrassment to their profession and it would never happen again.

Surprisingly, their “fix” had nothing to do with improvements in their ability to measure the constants.

Instead, they had redefined the constant so that it couldn’t change in the future, even if the measured value changed.

This is like saying a person’s foot is always twelve inches long no matter what size it is.

Upon reflection, I see Sheldrake doing the same thing with universal scientific laws that I did with universal religious laws.

He sees contradictions and seeks to resolve them.

His way to resolve the changing universal constants is to allow room for their evolution.

This may seem radical. However, with the evidence he has found, this is the least radical choice.

After all, if a constant isn’t constant, then it doesn’t qualify as a universal law.

In my case, I set aside the universal laws that had exceptions. They didn’t qualify.

Sheldrake isn’t doing that yet.

Therefore, he must say that there is room for the universal laws to evolve.

Accepting Change

May 31, 2013 in Future, World

I started following the story of Andrea Rossi’s efforts to create an alternative source for efficient power in October 2011

Mark Gibbs, a contributor to Forbes, introduced the story to me.

E-CatI responded by subscribing to the RSS feed for E-Cat World, a blog that covers all things Rossi, including what the website calls an “energy catalyzer” or “E-Cat.”

In addition, I talked with numerous people about the story. Almost everyone responded with skepticism. I was surprised to discover that those with the greatest amount of formal education were the most skeptical.

That realization reminded me that formal education is more about programming a belief system than the acquiring of knowledge. It is about creating a nation of workers (obedient slaves) rather than a nation of thinkers.

When I explained there appeared to be more power produced than was going into the system, they told me this violated “such-and-such a law” and, therefore, it wasn’t possible.

In one especially perplexing exchange, I was told that if I observed something that actually did what I described, it couldn’t be real.

When I asked, hypothetically, what a person should do if one observes such an event, my question was met with silence.

At the time, I was puzzled by the response.

Now, I understand the cognitive dissonance was too great.

The new information forced formally educated people outside their programmed belief system.

Today, as Rossi moves forward with his work, the formally educated/programmed people are about to have their belief system challenged again.

A couple weeks ago, Gibbs reported that Rossi had released the results of independent testing on his project.

Gibbs labels the energy source in the E-Cat as “cold fusion.” Rossi calls it a “Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR).”

And, although we still don’t know how the apparatus works, the tests demonstrate that whatever Rossi is doing has much greater energy potential than gasoline.

Of course, those with formal education/programming met the test results with skepticism.

The Discovery Channel listed five reasons Rossi’s cold fusion is bunk because the test results violate “such-and-such a law.”

Their response indicated a lack of understanding about Rossi’s work and an unwillingness to accept change.

This may be an attempt by energy moguls to discredit a technology that threatens their business interests.

Or, it may be another case of cognitive dissonance.

We have been programmed to think that the world operates a certain way.

Now, we are face-to-face with something that contradicts our programming.

We must either condemn the new information or admit we may not have completely understood the truth of the situation.

It remains possible that Rossi is a fraud and none of this is true.

Then again, we may have made a new discovery about our world and we need to change our understanding of it.

I’ll attempt to provide a framework for how to do this in tomorrow’s writing.

Resistance is Futile

April 18, 2013 in Spirituality, United States, World

Resistance is a flawed response if one is on the road to peace.

It assumes that the person or thing being resisted is not you.

It assumes that unity does not exist.

Resistance is futileIf one truly desires peace, resistance is futile.

Yes, I’ll explain.

Peace requires unity.

Therefore, resistance is a flawed response on the road to peace because it assumes there is something outside you.

Resistance reveals that a person believes unity does not exist.

This doesn’t mean that we blindly accept everything that comes our way.

This doesn’t mean that we are not active in our pursuit of the peaceful response.

It means we practice the philosophy found in eastern martial arts and redirect an aggressor’s energy to accomplish our goals.

It allows one person to provide the energy while another person provides the direction.

This isn’t possible with resistance.

With resistance, the energy is deadened.

It is wasted.

With awareness and unity, the energy may be redirected.

This is what I see some of my clients doing when they seemingly throw caution to the wind in fulfilling their earning potential and maximizing their cash flow, even when it results in a larger tax bill.

They are aware that “traditional tax advice” is not good advice. Therefore, they make their own decisions based upon their own goals.

They take the energy of the system and, rather than resist it, they redirect that energy for their own purposes.

Do you see the difference?

As I said yesterday, I see this happening in the way people are responding to Monday’s bombing during the Boston Marathon.

Instead of immediately pointing to an international terrorist suspect, many people, including mainstream media, considered whether government was involved.

As I watched President Obama’s initial press conference after the bombing, I noticed he was curt in his speech patterns.

He didn’t take questions afterwards.

His body language said he was annoyed rather than angry, irritated rather than concerned.

My interpretation is that he knew this was a false flag event and he was tired of playing his role in this type of scripted activity.

Rather than, as was done on 9/11, immediately accuse someone, Obama said, “We still don’t know who did this or why. People should not jump to conclusions before we have all the facts.”

I sensed he was saying, “You’re not going to use me to point fingers at someone who didn’t do this.”

Meanwhile, other signs of a false flag event have appeared.

Prior to the Boston bombing, the stock and metal markets fluctuated wildly, just as they did around 9/11.

The blast in Boston was followed by poison being sent in the mail to elected leaders, just as anthrax was sent to elected leaders after 9/11.

The mainstream media has reported on the arrest of the person responsible for sending the ricin.

They have been more hesitant to report that the arrested man was someone who, for more than ten years, had attempted to investigate the illegal organ harvesting market after discovering a refrigerator full of dismembered body parts and organs while working for a Mississippi healthcare organization.

Was he too close to the truth or is something else going on here?

As time goes by, will we discover that the ricin was produced in a CIA contractor’s laboratory just as the anthrax was in 2001?

Our awareness of previous events gives us clues regarding what may be taking place today.

With these clues, we can begin to understand that each of us is responsible for these acts.

The peaceful response allows us to assume that responsibility and redirect available energy.

With this understanding, it is obvious that resistance is futile.