You are browsing the archive for Judy Wood.

Avatar of MatthewCCox

by MatthewCCox

The Indigestion of Truth

May 4, 2012 in Opinion

I wrote yesterday that if we accept Michael Ruppert’s assertions that the CIA was complicit in the 9/11 attacks and we agree with Judy Wood that the twin towers were turned to powder by something other than fire, bombs, or thermite, we have a problem that solves itself.

The problem is that we are running out of petroleum resources. The solution is the energy technology that caused the building to disappear.

If this is the case, I would expect us to be jumping up and down at the good news proclaiming, “The world’s energy problems are solved! Long live free energy!”

However, we are not.

Upset stomachWe know that if we substantiate Ruppert’s writings and Wood’s research, we imply many other things must be true too. Those things are difficult to stomach.

For example, if the CIA planned the attacks on 9/11, one would have to wrestle with the following facts:

  • A United States intelligence agency killed more than three thousand American citizens on American soil. This resulted in a long-term war on foreign soil that killed 1.5 Million Iraqis. This doesn’t count those killed in other countries.
  • One of the motivations for these deaths was acquiring the control of Middle Eastern oil wells.
  • Another motivation was to prevent the new Taliban leadership from restricting heroin trade out of Afghanistan.
  • A third motivation was to create business opportunities for military and industrial corporations through first, destroying those countries and then, rebuilding them. Since the destruction included acts that would cause emotional upset to those nations’ citizens, the military would need to stay in place to protect those doing the rebuilding.

As a United States citizen, those things are difficult for me to stomach.

They indicate that our country’s government is involved in killing for the sake of oil and drugs. They demonstrate that the drug trade is important to our government. This raises questions.

Questions such as:

  • What else will the CIA do on American soil?
  • Is the CIA bringing drugs into the United States?
  • Is this being done to fund the CIA through the selling of drugs?
  • Is this being done to support the prison industry through the enforcement of drug laws?
  • Is this being done to create cash reserves for banks through the laundering of drug money?
  • What would happen to the banks if they didn’t have this cash?

Emotionally and psychologically, this is difficult to stomach.

If a secret energy technology was used on the towers, a person would have to accept the following facts:

  • Someone, either within or without the United States government, has a weapon so powerful that it can surgically remove the world’s tallest buildings.
  • The energy in this weapon literally changes the composition of certain materials. Not only does it turn building materials into powder. It also causes automobiles to rust, almost instantly.
  • This energy could be used for positive purposes such as the production of electricity. However, it has been hidden while we attempt to continue to run the world’s electricity using petrol.

This raises questions such as:

  • Who controls this energy?
  • What is it?
  • Why is it being hidden?

Emotionally and psychologically, this is difficult to stomach too.

However, if we all agreed that Ruppert’s well-documented conclusions are accurate and if we all saw what Judy Wood shows us is obvious, we would have to look at all of those things.

This would be difficult, extremely difficult, to stomach.

This explains, at least partially, why many people won’t look at this information. They won’t even consider it.

They are afraid they will discover it is true.

Then, they would have to respond.

If you have a knot in your stomach, you know exactly what I mean.

Tags: , , , 3 Comments »

Avatar of MatthewCCox

by MatthewCCox

A Problem That Resolves Itself

May 3, 2012 in Opinion, United States, World

I believe that within every disappointment, heartbreak, or failure is something of equal, and usually greater, positive benefit. My observation is that the greatest obstacle to this benefit is one’s resistance to receiving it.

This raises the question, “What benefit from 9/11 are we resisting?”

My latest reading material is Michael Ruppert’s Crossing the Rubicon. I introduced Ruppert a few days ago in another article.

Ruppert, a former LAPD detective, uses Rubicon to thoroughly connect the dots between oil, drugs, money, government, banks, and the 9/11 attacks. There is no doubt in his mind that the CIA, with the endorsement of top United States government officials, orchestrated 9/11 to accomplish several goals. These include controlling the diminishing oil supply, ensuring liquid cash from the drug trade, and an excuse for domestic repression during an anticipated resource shortage.

The premise of Ruppert’s thoughts centers on a concept he calls “Peak Oil.” It is the idea that mankind has passed the time of peak oil production. He argues that consumption of oil continues to grow while production has started to decline. He believes this will eventually lead to the collapse of humanity.

Of course, Ruppert has his detractors. Google his name with the word “crazy” and more than three hundred thousand hits appear. If we look into those criticisms, it is difficult to find any that dispute Ruppert’s research.

The reason is simple. Ruppert, like Judy Wood, carefully documents his statements.

While reading the first hundred pages of Rubicon, I noticed something else.

SolutionsIf we link Ruppert’s research with Judy Wood’s discoveries, we get a problem that resolves itself.

Rupport claims government used 9/11 to gain control of oil supplies and liquid cash from the drug trade while implementing domestic repression during upcoming resource shortages.

Wood implies government used an alternative energy source on 9/11.

Do you see what I see?

Wood’s evidence opens the way to overcome Rupport’s resource shortages. It makes control of oil and cash a non-issue.

If the energy source that turned the twin towers to powder really exists, – and we have to assume it does because of what happened – why couldn’t it be used to resolve the forecasted energy shortages?

If an energy field can be created that turns one million tons of building materials into dust and causes automobiles to spontaneously combust, why can’t it be used to generate electrical power?

If this energy source could be used instead of petrol, the United States military would no longer need to control foreign oil fields. This would free financial resources and cash reserves to be used on sustenance items.

Is it possible that the destruction on 9/11 has distracted us from the bigger story?

Is it possible that the disappointment and heartbreak of 9/11 holds something of greater, positive benefit?

I believe it does.

I believe that positive benefit is an alternative energy source – and possibly several – that, if made available for the use of the general public, could turn into the so-called “free energy system” that many people claim has been hidden from the general public.

Ruppert clearly shows us that government officials were complicit in the acts on 9/11.

Wood clearly shows us that an alternative energy source was used on 9/11.

Now, it is up to the general public to take this information, hidden in plain sight, and find a way to implement it in our day to day lives.

In spite of all of this information, it appears we are hesitant to receive this benefit.

Why?

I’ll look at the reasons in tomorrow’s article.

Tags: , , , 1 Comment »

Avatar of MatthewCCox

by MatthewCCox

Responding to Criticism

May 2, 2012 in United States, World

As an information junky, I have developed regular sources for acquiring data. In addition, I keep my eyes and ears open for anything outside of these sources that may provide me with interesting intelligence.

CriticismMore often than not, the best data comes from sources that are the most criticized. I’ve learned that the more someone is criticized, the more I should pay attention to what they are saying because, apparently, they are a threat to someone.

In some cases, this criticism seems to be well-planned, as if someone was attempting to accomplish a specific agenda. In fact, I actually know people who set up Google Alerts to email them whenever a certain topic appears in a new blog post so they can go to the site and discredit that topic.

Therefore, when Terry commented on last Friday’s article, I assumed he was a Judy Wood debunker. Of course, it is sometimes difficult to determine if someone is a debunker or a genuine searcher.

In an effort to determine a person’s perspective, my standard reply when someone appears to be debunking is to point to the facts. This allows me to sort out the professional debunkers from those genuinely looking for answers.

My intention is to uncover what is really going on with a situation rather than argue about opinions. I know that if someone will take the time to look at the facts and get back to me, then we can have an intelligent discussion in which we both learn something.

I was pleasantly surprised when Terry commented on yesterday’s article and told me that was exactly what he did. In fact, I suggest you click on this link and read Terry’s well-written comment.

I’m thrilled that he did the research, drew his own conclusions, and raised his own questions. I believe these questions need a deeper look.

As a result, I’ve decided to answer those questions before writing the additional information I promised in yesterday’s article.

The first question Terry raises is, “Why won’t Dr. Wood call the results of her research a “theory”?”

I have several clients who are professional scientists and science educators. They love to discuss puzzling information. However, they often correct me when I use the words “theory” and “proof.”

Apparently, these are borderline sacred words in the scientific community. Therefore, for a theory to exist there must be proof to support it. My scientist friends patronizingly explain to me that, “Evidence is not proof because evidence can be circumstantial and circumstantial evidence is not necessarily proof.”

Based on this, my clients have explained that it is “bad science” to compile evidence into a theory if there is no proof for it. At first this seemed like semantics to me. However, I think I now almost understand what they are saying.

For example, in Dr. Wood’s work, there is lots of evidence to support the fact that fire, thermite, or bombs did not cause the towers to disappear. However, she has no direct knowledge (proof) of what could have caused so much material to turn to dust. This information is classified and “if someone told her, they would have to kill her.”

Based on her body language during presentations, I suspect she has been threatened. I wouldn’t be surprised if someone had said to her, “Listen, you are really close to the truth. However, we are not going to let you ever tell the truth. Here are the guidelines you must stay within if you want to stay alive.”

This message, combined with her scientific training, motivates her to make less than definitive statements about her data. Therefore, she doesn’t present proof to support a theory. She presents evidence.

This also partially explains the answer to Terry’s second question: “Why don’t we have genuine debate towards resolving the mystery of the disappearance of the towers?”

The discussion would reveal information that could result in tremendous outcry from the general public.

For example, consider the public’s response if mainstream media suddenly reported that, as a result of thorough investigation, it had been discovered that a secret energy weapon, developed through United States funding, was used upon American buildings on 9/11 or something similar.

(WOW! Can you imagine?!?!)

Of course, alternative media is already saying these things.

And, it has been written in numerous, well-documented books.

I’ll consider one of those often criticized books tomorrow.

Tags: , , Comments Off

Avatar of MatthewCCox

by MatthewCCox

Exploring the Signs

May 1, 2012 in United States, World

If the World Trade Center towers were not taken down by fire, thermite, or bombs, what caused them to disappear?

Based on the evidence I have seen and the technology I know about, I don’t know.

Dr. Judy Wood says she doesn’t know either. However, she describes this technology’s capabilities.

World Trade CenterIt is capable of pulverizing steel, marble, granite, glass, concrete, and carbon-based life forms. It is not capable of pulverizing paper.

It causes automobiles to spontaneously combust. However, the damage to some vehicles may be resisted by rubber seals on doors.

It produces glowing metal not hot enough to burn paper. In addition, it produces high energy readings that some instruments record as incredibly high temperatures. However, rescuers are able to work in those conditions without experiencing the recorded heat.

Dr. Wood is careful not to draw conclusions about what it is. However, she provides information about laboratory experiments and patents that replicate similar results. These include videos and documents that describe the “Hutchison Effect,” a phenomenon researched by John Hutchison.

As I listened to Judy’s presentations, reviewed her documents, and looked at the pictures, I thought to myself, “This sounds like Tesla-type technology.”

DISCLAIMER: This was MY thought. Please don’t say I’m saying Judy Wood said this. She didn’t. In fact, Judy has been careful to talk only about technologies that have been patented or can be recreated in demonstrations. This is why she often talks about George Samuel Piggott’s work (It is patented.) or references John Hutchison (He is still alive.).

As I was mulling over the implications, a link to this story from the Idaho Observer showed up in one of my subscribed blog feeds. The article describes the relationship between Nikola Tesla and George H. Scherf Sr.

Scherf was Tesla’s accountant and business manager. He was also a German spy, assigned by Hitler to swipe Tesla’s technology for Germany’s use.

(On a side note, Scherf’s son, George Jr. was a curious and obnoxious little man and, according to the article, provided the inspiration for the name of a children’s cartoon character, “Curious George.” Apparently, Tesla was an acquaintance of H. A. and Margret Rey.)

When Tesla died, Scherf ended up with Tesla’s writings and technologies. It is unclear if Hitler benefitted from this information. However, it may have served a purpose for the Scherf family.

The reason I say this is, according to the Idaho Observer, somewhere along the line, Scherf Sr. changed his first name to Prescott and the family changed their last name to Bush.

Prescott’s son, AKA George Scherf Jr. (Curious George), AKA George H. Bush, served as head of the CIA, Vice-President to United States President Ronald Reagan, and the 41st President of the United States.

Prescott’s grandson, George H. W. Bush was the 43rd President of the United States and was in office on 9/11. Most of us remember the absence of shock on his face when he first heard news that the towers had fallen.

Is it possible that he didn’t look surprised because he wasn’t surprised?

Is it possible that the Bush family had access to Tesla’s technology?

Is it possible they helped develop it for use on 9/11?

I compared the picture of the Scherfs in the Idaho Observer article with pictures of Prescott and George H Bush. There were enough similarities for me to say it was possible the Scherfs were the Bushes. In addition, the numerous contradictions in the history of the Bushes, as documented in the footnotes of the article, certainly leave a lot of holes in Prescott’s childhood.

Of course, this is pure speculation on my part. I’m only looking at the observations made by Judy Wood, commenting on an article written in the Idaho Observer, and making a possible connection because this information showed up in my life at the same time.

Did it really happen this way?

I don’t know. I don’t have enough evidence to prove it.

Is it worth consideration?

I believe it is because it coincides with my personal philosophy of following the signs that show up in my life.

What is the peaceful response?

I won’t panic. I won’t jump to conclusions. Instead, I will continue to evaluate this idea based on other information that shows up in my life.

…and a lot of information has shown up in my life over the past week or so.

I’ll start writing about that tomorrow.

Tags: , , , 3 Comments »

Avatar of MatthewCCox

by MatthewCCox

The World’s Biggest Applecart

April 30, 2012 in Finance, United States, World

What we believe determines what we say and what we do. Therefore, if we are to understand how we got to where we are as a society, we need to identify those beliefs. Then, if we want to change our society, we will need to change our beliefs.

This is why I have taken several days to talk about upsetting and resetting applecarts (belief systems). I know that evaluating belief systems is a critical part of conscious living. To me, it feels like spring cleaning for the soul.

Yesterday, I took a look at how my belief system concerning 9/11 has evolved over the years. This article continues that look.

I believe our perception of 9/11 will determine how we vote in the upcoming elections. It will determine whether we participate in the new financial system with resistance or acceptance.

In fact, I have observed that one’s perception of that day often determines a person’s entire world view.

Therefore, it is critical to understand what happened that day….

…and what didn’t happen.

This brings me back to Judy Wood’s work.

World Trade Center dustDr. Wood’s presentations of the information from 9/11 is methodical and thorough. (If you want to see them for yourself, search her name on YouTube. There are numerous videos of her presentations.) She points out that the twin towers transformed into powder. She shows videos of building parts changing to dust on the way to the ground. She shows images of automobiles that spontaneously caught fire that day, some of them on the opposite side of Manhattan.

This mystery of the buildings turning to powder is not unfamiliar to those who followed this story. This video from mainstream media contains numerous questions about what happened to the hundreds of thousands of tons of building materials that converted into powder before landing on the ground.

Judy’s presentation, using The Socratic Method, eliminates many of the initial ideas about 9/11. For example, if bombs, thermite, or fire had felled the towers, there would have been a pile of building materials left.

There wasn’t.

There was only powder and paper.

Even though Dr. Wood only presents information, she certainly has her critics. In fact, when I first mentioned her name on this website, a comment showed up, almost immediately, criticizing her work. This detractor pointed me to a discussion group where a heated debate was taking place over whether or not Judy’s conclusions were valid.

As I reviewed the discussion, I realized those people hadn’t read or listened to her work. Or, if they had, they didn’t understand it.

They were claiming Dr. Wood’s conclusions are unsupportable. However, Judy doesn’t draw conclusions. She asks questions, based on the evidence, to help the listener form his or her own opinions.

Other critics say the buildings could not have fallen the way she says they fell.

Dr. Wood’s response is to ask if the buildings are still there. After all, she is only observing what happened.

The more I studied the evidence presented by Dr. Wood, the more I came to realize that we don’t know exactly what caused the buildings to fall. Judy admits that she doesn’t know either. She just knows that, based on the evidence, it wasn’t fire, thermite, or bombs.

Therefore, it must be something else.

The exploration of this something else must take place if we are to understand the ramifications surrounding this pivotal point in our modern history.

I will continue this exploration tomorrow.

Tags: , , , Comments Off

Avatar of MatthewCCox

by MatthewCCox

Resetting the Applecarts

April 29, 2012 in Finance, United States, World

An upset applecart isn’t the worst thing in the world, especially in my case. After all, I don’t literally have a cart full of apples. My applecarts are my beliefs; the things I thought were true.

When an individual has his or her beliefs upset, there are numerous ways to respond, just as there are numerous ways to respond when a real applecart is upset.

Reset applecartA person can complain, blame, seek revenge, and leave the apples splayed across the ground. Or, a person can pick up the cart and reload it. With the latter choice, this allows the individual to inspect the apples, throw out the bad, and keep the good.

This is true for belief systems too.

9/11 provides a good example.

In 2001, I was still relying on mainstream media for my news. Therefore, I believed the official story that the heat from jet fuel felled the towers. I believed that Al Qaeda was responsible. I believed the war on terror was necessary.

Then, I started to hear questions. Had fire ever taken down another high-rise building? Where did Al Qaeda receive its funding? Who benefited the most from the war on terror?

The answers upset my beliefs about the media.

Fire had never caused another high-rise building to fall. There was no evidence that fire was the cause for the falling of the towers. In fact, there was evidence that something else caused the building to disappear.

Al Qaeda was funded by the CIA. The organization had been initiated and sponsored by United States Government organizations.

Oil companies, banks, and military benefited the most from the war on terror. President Eisenhower had warned us to beware of the Military Industrial Complex. Now, I understood this warning.

In my search to uncover what removed the towers, I stumbled upon Judy Wood’s research. Last fall, when I read it for the first time, I couldn’t understand it. She referenced the possibility of energy sources that were unfamiliar to me.

More accurately, I didn’t believe they existed.

Then, I began to meet people who could explain them to me. Richard Hoagland showed up at our home for Thanksgiving. Over pie, I listened to him debate a scientist from a local federal laboratory. I learned a lot.

I read books that introduced me to Nikola Tesla. I viewed videos that demonstrated remarkable technologies. My family and I witnessed a UFO fly overhead while we had dinner on our back patio.

These experiences upset my beliefs about science.

Then, I noticed that government and banking didn’t work the way I believed they worked. I saw injustices and police state actions that violated the United States Constitution. I saw law enforcement seizing property without due process. I saw banks foreclosing on homes illegally.

These observations upset my belief about government and finance.

My response has been to attempt to reconcile my recent upsets to my belief systems caused by those answer, experiences, and observations; to attempt to reset my applecarts.

I have a friend who says this is a problem with mankind. We won’t allow chaos to exist. We must have an explanation for everything. Therefore, we create order out of chaos. Often, this leads us to develop intricate theories to explain the unexplainable.

This may be true. However, I don’t yet believe that.

I believe there is a Divine order to things. I say this because the evidence I see around me in nature demonstrates this divine order. I wrote about this in November.

Today, I believe this more than ever because, in my efforts to reset my applecarts, I have found apples I didn’t know existed. These new beliefs have opened my mind to new possibilities.

These new possibilities provide hope of a better world and a grander future. I would not have found these new possibilities if my applecarts hadn’t been upset. Therefore, I am grateful for those upsets and for the opportunity to create order out of chaos.

I’ll continue these thoughts during tomorrow’s article.

Tags: , , , , 1 Comment »

Avatar of MatthewCCox

by MatthewCCox

Upsetting My Applecarts

April 27, 2012 in United States, World

I experienced a wave of energy from an external source at five o’clock this morning. I heard it and felt it. The windows shook. It upset my dreamland applecart.

I figured it was a sonic boom.

My online research confirmed my guess. Local media had advance warning of it.

If you hear a loud boom early Friday morning it’s only a supersonic target launched from 50,000 feet about 30 miles south of Albuquerque breaking the sound barrier as it speeds toward an impact zone at White Sands Missile Range. It’s part of a Navy test for an airborne early warning and control system and should happen between 5 a.m. and 7 a.m.

I read the snippet of info several times because it was the only online mention I could find about this early morning explosion. It was so cryptic that it didn’t really tell me what it was.

As I wrote about the first one, I experienced it again. Like the first one, it was followed by what sounded like the sound of a passenger jet flying overhead. My wife and I went outside to see what we could see.

It looked like an “abnormal airplane” and produced a contrail going north to south.

I came back and read the media description again and realized that the only detail that may have been accurate was the 50,000 feet. I live about ten miles east of Albuquerque. The flight path and the resulting contrail were directly overhead. Obviously, whatever it was originated this part of its flight from northeast of Albuquerque.

I still have no idea what the Navy was really testing and why it had to be done so early in the morning. However, it capped a week that has left my head spinning and, as of this morning, my ears roaring.

Upset ApplecartIt has also upset a lot of my applecarts.

It seems that everywhere I turn; I’m learning that much of what I thought to be true isn’t.

Over the past few weeks, I have read several of John Perkins’ books. Perkins worked as an Economic Hit Man. His insights and experiences provide a solid foundation for understanding how United States corporations have, with the assistance of the United States military, pillaged the natural resources of other countries.

I once thought the United States was the world’s leader in freedom. I thought this nation stood for democracy and individual freedom. Now, I realize that my thoughts had been carefully programmed through my education and the media. The reality is that America hides behind those ideas of freedom while pilfering other countries. This upsets one of my applecarts.

Earlier this week, I listened to a presentation by Judy Wood. Dr. Wood has undergraduate degrees in Civil Engineering and Structural Engineering. She has a master degree in Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics) and a PhD in Materials Engineering Science. She recently released her book Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11.

I am several years past believing that an airplane fuel fire felled the towers. The best explanation I had heard was thermite or bombs. Wood’s work upsets those applecarts by providing volumes of evidence that the World Trade Center Towers were “dustified.”

She doesn’t have evidence that shows who did it and how it was done. However, she does provide enough data to eliminate airplane fuel, thermite, and bombs as possible sources for the destruction of the buildings on that September day in 2001.

Dr. Wood has filed lawsuits in an attempt to present her evidence in a legal environment. However, no judge will give the evidence hearing. It seems that no one is willing to be the next potential target of this “dustification” technology.

If that wasn’t enough, the other pieces of information I encountered this week shook my belief system even more and turned over several other personal applecarts. I’ll write about those in tomorrow’s article.

Tags: , , , , 4 Comments »